The court denied Google’s renewed motion to dismiss for improper venue because it had a regular and established place of business in the district through its Google Global Cache servers housed by third-party ISPs. “[W]hile a virtual space or electronic communications alone are insufficient to denote a ‘place’ within the meaning of the statute, they may, with more, be indicative of the requirement having been met. . . . Here . . . there is more than ‘merely’ ‘a virtual space or  electronic communications from one person to another.’ The ‘place’ is specifically localized: a physical server occupying a physical space. Not only does Google exercise exclusive control . . . over the digital aspects of the GGC, Google exercises exclusive control over the physical server and the physical space within which the server is located and maintained. . . . [Defendant’s] ownership of the server and its contents is absolute, as is [its] control over the server’s location once it is installed. . . . The statute does not require ‘substantial’ business or ‘large’ impact from the business being done at the place of business — in order to lay proper venue in a judicial district, the statute simply requires that a regular and established place of business be present.”
SEVEN Networks, LLC v. Google LLC, 2-17-cv-00442 (TXED July 19, 2018, Order) (Gilstrap, USDJ)
View the original article here: Google Global Cache Server Housed in Local ISP Qualifies as Regular and Established Place of Business
The article was originally posted on Docket Report.
Each article is copyrighted to their original authors. We do not own any rights to the news or the images used. Whilst every care is taken to ensure that the news posts published are accurate, we cannot guarantee the authenticity of the news article on every occasion. There’s no copyright infringement intended. The news is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice.