By Kevin E. Noonan — Sherry Knowles, former chief patent counsel of GlaxoSmithKline, and Dr. Anthony Prosser, a member of her team at Knowles Intellectual Strategies LLC, have written an article recently published in The John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law entitled “Unconstitutional Application of 35 U.S.C. 101 by the U.S. Supreme Court.” The authors’ thesis is stark: that the Supreme Court has improperly (and unconstitutionally) arrogated to itself a definition of patent eligibility that is inconsistent with over 200 years of statutory law enacted by Congress under its Article I powers. The authors tracked the legislative history of…
View the original article here: Law Review Article Advocates Supreme Court’s Patent Eligibility Law is Unconstitutional
The article was originally posted on Patent Docs.
Each article is copyrighted to their original authors. We do not own any rights to the news or the images used. Whilst every care is taken to ensure that the news posts published are accurate, we cannot guarantee the authenticity of the news article on every occasion. There’s no copyright infringement intended. The news is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice.