By Antony Craggs — Since the introduction of the doctrine of equivalents in the UK in Actavis v Lilly, it has been questioned whether a claim can be extended by said doctrine (so that a product infringes the claim) where such an extension would render the claim obvious over the prior art at the priority date. In Technetix v Teleste, HHJ Hacon has offered obiter guidance on the point. Background — Actavis v Lilly Actavis v Lilly introduced the following questions when assessing infringement: 1. Does the variant infringe any of the claims as a matter of normal interpretation; and,…
View the original article here: News from Abroad — Technetix v Teleste: Doctrine of Equivalents
The article was originally posted on Patent Docs.
Each article is copyrighted to their original authors. We do not own any rights to the news or the images used. Whilst every care is taken to ensure that the news posts published are accurate, we cannot guarantee the authenticity of the news article on every occasion. There’s no copyright infringement intended. The news is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice.