Patent News

VLSI v. Intel patent trial to go forward in Western District of Texas on Monday as judge denies Intel’s last-minute transfer motion

About six weeks ago, Fortress-funded VLSI Technology won a record $2.175 billion damages verdict against Intel in the Western District of Texas, which is by far the busiest patent court in the United States by now. That first VLSI v. Intel decision is not final; an appeal has been announced. On Monday (April 12), another case involving the same parties will go to trial in Waco, TX.

On Friday (April 9), Judge Alan Albright denied–without even stating any reasons–the following Intel motion to transfer the case from Waco to Austin (or to postpone the trial in the alternative):

21-04-07 Intel Motion to Tr… by Florian Mueller

Intel argues that it can’t get a fair trial in Waco so shortly after the big news that the early-March verdict made in the local media: “juror awareness of the prior enormous verdict would be highly prejudicial to Intel.”

I guess Intel knew from the beginning that Judge Albright was going to go ahead with the second VLSI v. Intel trial no matter what. But if Intel lost and appealed, then it preserved certain arguments by way of this motion.

Intel and Apple are challenging Fortress Investment’s aggregation of patents in an antitrust action in the Northern District of California, where they recently brought their second amended complaint after the original complaint and the first amended complaint had been dismissed. Meanwhile, Fortress-funded entities are pursuing infringement cases against Apple and Intel in different jurisdictions.

Share with other professionals via LinkedIn:

var addthis_config = {“data_track_clickback”:true};

View the original article here: VLSI v. Intel patent trial to go forward in Western District of Texas on Monday as judge denies Intel’s last-minute transfer motion

The article was originally posted on FOSS Patents.
Each article is copyrighted to their original authors. We do not own any rights to the news or the images used. Whilst every care is taken to ensure that the news posts published are accurate, we cannot guarantee the authenticity of the news article on every occasion. There’s no copyright infringement intended. The news is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice.