Alice in Patentland: Cryptopeak Solutions, LLC v. Multiple Defendants
- Nov 12, 2016
- 1 Comments
Plaintiff | Cryptopeak Solutions |
Defendant | Multiple Defendants |
Court | Eastern District Of Texas Marshall Division |
Judge | Judge Roy S. Payne |
Motion | Motion to Dismiss |
Decision | DENIED |
Decision Date | September 9, 2016 |
- recite both a method and an apparatus (IPXL),
- are directed to unpatentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101
- are indefinite under 35 U.S.C. § 112 because they use subjective terms that fail to provide reasonable certainty about the scope of the invention to one of ordinary skill in the art. (Indefiniteness)
1 Comment
Bobby
Very engrossing article, every point has been explained well.